Even in countries that have not adopted UPAA/UPMAA such as New York, properly executed marriage contracts have the same presumption of legality as any other treaty.  It is not necessary for a couple who signs a marriage pact to keep separate lawyers to represent him as long as each party understands the agreement and signs it voluntarily with the intention of being bound by its terms. There is a strong public policy that favours parties that control and decide their own interests through contracts.  There are no state or federal laws requiring adults with contractual capacity to hire a lawyer in order to enter into a marriage contract such as a marriage contract, with the exception of a California law that requires the parties to be represented by a lawyer if spousal assistance (support) is limited by the agreement.  The marriage agreement may be challenged if it is proven that the contract was signed under duress.  Whether a pre-marriage contract was signed under duress must be justified by the facts and circumstances of this case. For example, it was found that a spouse`s assertion that she believed there would be no marriage if it was not a marriage, where the marriage was only two weeks away and marriage plans had been made, was not sufficient to demonstrate coercion.  While the laws enacted by the states that adopt the UPAA/UPMA have some state-to-state differences, this legislative framework has certainly made it much easier for lawyers to prepare enforceable marriage contracts for clients by clearly defining the requirements. For example, under Florida law, there is a very significant difference in what is needed to enter into a legally binding marriage agreement compared to a post-marriage agreement in.
To effectively waive the rights of spouses that are generally available to a surviving spouse under Florida law (e.g.B. firm, electoral percentage, free wealth, family allowances, etc.), parties must present their assets and commitments in a comprehensive and fair manner before entering into a post-employment agreement. On the other hand, no financial disclosure is required to waive the same spousal rights in a pre-marital contract executed before marriage.  However, if the lack of disclosure makes a prenup unacceptable (unfair to a spouse) under the Florida Uniform Act, this may not be applicable for these reasons.  At every wedding, but especially in high-level celebrity marriages, the old mantra “Hope for the best, but plan for the worse” always seems true. With our wishes, we offer the happy couple a sober proposal to conclude a post-uptial agreement. In 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court granted same-sex marriage the same legal basis as same-sex marriage, in the case of Obergefell v.